1- Associate Professor of Jurisprudence amd Law at Yasouj University. 2- Department of Philosophy, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.
Abstract: (442 Views)
If we want to mention the two effective and famous philosopher in the Seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, doubtless we had to express empiricist John Locke and rationalist Immanuel Kant. Locke and Kant not only had special thoughts in politics, but also in philosophy. The purpose of this study was to survey the main view point of Locke and Kant about property that is one of the basic subjects of political philosophy. The central point of Locke’s political philosophy is property, he defines the property as “labor mixing with nature”, therefore work creates property and human had property in both nature and civil states and the purpose of government formation is to improve and protect individual properties. Kant suggested another form for property. He distinguished two types of properties, first physical property, that is occupied by material things, and second “intellectual property” or “rightfull property” that is not limited by time, space and experiment. Kant says in nature state, the property is temporary and government formation cause to definite the property. In kant’s theory, not only work does not cause property, but he refused locke’s argumantation that the property based on the “ mixing the person’s work with something”
- Bahmanpouri, A., Hosseini, A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Natural law and Natural Rights from the Point of View of the Intellectual Philosophy of Locke and Kant, Journal of Legal Philosophy Studies, 1(1), 139-160.
Bahmanpouri A, Hosseini A. Comparative Analysis of Natural law and Natural Rights from the Point of View of the Intellectual Philosophy of Locke and Kant. Journal title 2024; 1 (1) :139-160 URL: http://philosophylawjournal.ir/article-1-28-en.html